Monday, June 26, 2006


The Insanity Of Santorum


I didn't want to go too long without commenting on this story, but watching it continue to develop, I couldn't wait any longer.

Today's Wall Street Journal carries a column by Rick Santorum defending his press conference regarding the alleged discovery of WMDs in Iraq. Despite all of the facts coming out against this "new discovery," Rick Santorum and the Apologists continue to make feeble attempts to retroactively legitimize the war in Iraq by suggesting that Saddam, in fact, DID have WMDs.

This, despite the fact that the Department of Defense has already stated that these weapons were there prior to the Iraq-Iran war, were degraded beyond the point of usefullness, and WERE NOT the weapons in question as we decided to go to war with Iraq.

Look, Apologists... even the Bush Administration, KNOWN for its ability to latch on to a good lie and run with it... have steered clear of this one.

Here's the chain of events. For those regular readers of PTF who trust me to point you in the right direction for your news, please note - I will be linking to several unsavory websites in telling this story - I ask that you look at all of the links, as it shows what the Apologists are attempting to feed America as a feces-laced excuse for the truth.

This will more than likely be a lengthy post, as well - not the typical style here, but worth the additional space and time.

Last Wednesday, Rick Santorum and Peter Hoekstra held a hurried press conference to exclaim to the world that WMDs had indeed been found in Iraq. Cable news networks were quick to jump on this news and run with it:



Let's pick apart what was reported here on Faux News... Faux host E.D. Hill intros the interview with Santorum by stating the Administration position:
"'...there's WMD there, we gotta take them out, they've used it in the past, they're going to use it again'... Saddam says 'I've gotten rid of it all'... and everyone around the world... all the intelligence says, 'Bull'... guess what? They found it!"
So, right from the start, the lies have begun. The WMDs that Santorum speaks of are NOT the weapons that the Administration was concerned about prior to the start of the war. In fact, the day BEFORE this interview, the Department of Defense came out and stated this. During weapons inspections that the ISG were conducting, it was widely reported that these isolated degraded caches were being found, and were found to be about as lethal as anything you might have under your kitchen sink.

She also states:
"I can't believe that the Administration isn't shouting it from the rooftops...."
Hmmm... ever stop to think why that may be, E.D.?

As the interview begins, and Santorum begins trumpeting his discovery, Faux Lunkhead Steve Doocey states:
"We understand, Senator, that a lot of them were old things.. probably before '91, but they're still potent, and they're still weapons of mass destruction...."
Yes, and there are land mines that remain buried to this day in over 80 countries around the world, but that hasn't led the United States to attack these countries... it hasn't even led the United States to ratify the antipersonnel mine ban treaty.

Santorum states:
"I remind people that we have reports from when Saddam bombed the Kurds with chemical weapons, three of these sarin-filled munitions killed 5,000 people...."
Yes, Rick. We have all stipulated the point that Saddam was a bad man, that he killed people in horrible ways, and that these chemical weapons that he had AT THAT TIME were dangerous. What is NOT mentioned here is that those weapons were used when they were still at their full potency.

This argument is like saying that you found an old munition on the battlefield of Gettysburg, and then reminding people of how many people were killed with that Civil War relic, in hopes that you'd convince them it was still capable of that power.

Santorum continues:
"The big concern we had... is that Saddam had these weapons, he said he didn't. He lied obviously. Not Bush, but Saddam lied that he didn't have these munitions...."
Sorry, Rick. Wrong answer. Bush DID lie. More than Saddam did, at least in this given instance. What is being found are isolated deposits of degraded weapons left over from a previous war that went unaccounted for. These are weapons that were buried by troops during the war prior to 1991, and that were not accounted for as "being destroyed" any more than another military power would account for unused land mines buried during a military conflict.

Bush, on the other hand, DIRECTLY LIED about the rationale for war, stating that Saddam was not only reconstituting chemical and biological weapons programs, of which there is NO PROOF being found to this day - a fact that Bush stipulates himself according to the final report of the ISG. HE LIED in stating that there was any possible means of delivering these said WMDs in any way, of which there was none. HE LIED in stating that Saddam was building nuclear weapons, of which no proof has been found.

I won't continue to dissect this interview, as the lies become self-evident over and over again throughout the four minutes, and I would simply be repeating myself.

Instead, let's move on. Here's the Pentagon, and Donald Rumsfeld speaking on Wednesday shortly after Santorum's press conference - pay attention to how closely he parses his words here:



Rumsfeld is careful here not to overstate what was found, while not raining on Ricky's parade. Yes, we found these canisters. Yes, they probably had sarin in them at one point. Yes, sarin is bad. That's about as far as Rumsfeld willing to go.

Meanwhile, the Iraq Survey Group Final Report states that:
"While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad’s desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear of force against it should WMD be discovered."
This report in 2004, coincidentally, was what convinced Bush himself that Saddam did not have the weapons that initiated our war with Iraq. Read it in Bush's own words.

Not only this, but the DoD actually denounced the news that Santorum delivered - a fact which Santorum received live on the air.

Quoting the source at the Department of Defense:
"This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991.... (these weapons) are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war."
Or perhaps you'd prefer to hear it from the words of David Kay, former UN Chief Weapons Inspector and Former Iraq Survey Group Chief, appointed by none other than George Bush himself. He clearly stated that Santourm presented information that was:
"...wrong as to the facts and exaggerated beyond all reason as to the interpretation of the "facts'. There is no surprise that very small numbers of chemical canisters from the Iran-Iraq war have been found. The ISG found them and in my testimony in 2004 I said that I expected that we would continue to find them for a long time. These are in very small numbers and are scattered. The nerve agents have long since degraded to the point that they no longer pose any substantial threat."
No doubt that by this point, most rational people would end the discussion. After all, is it the contention of the Republican Right Wing that the White House wouldn't declassify information about WMDs the MOMENT that they were found after all of these years of criticism it has received for lying about the reasons we went to war in the first place?

Is it the contention of these Apologists that, beyond the baisc facts, the White House would supress this information based on the notion that it didn't want to embarrass the CIA - the same CIA of which the White House has been so critical?

Or is it more likely that a Senator from Pennsylvania is down by huge numbers in the polls, and is trying desperately to save his political life?

Despite this, the retroactive justification continues. Idiotic Apologist bloggers are suggesting that not only that George Bush never lied about WMDs based on the press conference held by Rick Santorum, but that Democrats should be publicly apologizing for ever doubting the President.

It truly takes an idiot to suppose that these "newly discovered" caches equate with an imminent threat. What becomes moronic is the supposition that somehow the White House is trying to cover up this fact.

Thank God for folks like Keith Olbermann, who just body slams the entire story here:



If Santorum hadn't already sealed his fate in November, he certainly has now.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted by FleshPresser at 2:58 PM /

2 Comments

  • Blogger jay lassiter posted at 3:50 PM  
    the bad news? rick santorum is your senator.

    the good news? come November, you're the decider!

    living in newjersey, i can say for sure that i'll take lautenberg and menendez over specter and santorum ANY DAY!

  • Blogger FleshPresser posted at 7:35 PM  
    To be clear, I have not lived in PA long enough to have the pleasure of voting against Rick Santorum.... that is until this November.

    Trust me... he won't make it out of November alive.

    And while neither of my Senators are a prize, what's up with Menendez voting in FAVOR of the flag desecration amendment... are you KIDDING me?

  • Post a Comment

    « Home